2001-2002 ACC Preview
Part Two - Clemson

 

The following is Part Two of Rob Clough's 2001-2002 ACC Preview.  As always, Rob's article is among the most thorough available anywhere.

Rob's full preview will be posted according to the following schedule (in inverse order of last season's ACC standings):

9/29 - 2000-2001 ACC Predictions vs. Reality
9/29 - Clemson
9/30 - Florida State
9/30 - NC State
10/1 - Wake Forest
10/1 - Georgia Tech
10/2 - Virginia
10/3 - Maryland
10/4 - North Carolina
10/5 - Duke
10/8 - 2001-2002 Projections
10/9 - ACC Schedule Analysis
 

  Clemson (12-19, 2-14 ACC) 

2001 Round-Up: 

   With a solid recruiting class in place and one of the league's best scorers, the Tigers were looking to take a step up in 2001.  Instead, it was just more of the same.  The Tigers could find no consistent offense beyond Will Solomon and frosh find Tony Stockman.  They had very little inside presence and couldn't defend anyone, ranking last in steals, blocked shots and points per game surrendered.  Despite all this, the Tigers actually did improve in 2001; the problem, as I noted in the mid-season ACC report, is that everyone else in the league got better as well.  On the rare occasions when the Tigers got hot from the perimeter, they could cause some problems, but most good teams were able to lock in on Solomon and reduce his effectiveness.  As the season wore on, he started to shoot worse and worse.  He only scored over 20 twice after February 1st, and it's no great surprise to see why Clemson only won 2 of their last 10 games.

  The season started with some promise, as the Tigers won 7 of their first 9 games.  Of course, this included such powerhouses as Wofford and FAU, but also included a 1-point loss to then-top 10 Seton Hall and a solid win over top mid-major program Winthrop.  They went into the ACC season with a 10-4 record and some optimism.  This was bolstered by a 12-point loss to Maryland where the Tigers managed to score 92 points on one of the top contenders in the ACC, with Solomon looking unstoppable.  Then reality descended upon Clemson in the form of a 115-74 beating at Duke.  Solomon was made invisible in that game, a demoralizing loss for the program.  Things perked up with an upset win over NC State, but that was followed by 8 straight league losses. Some were blowouts, like the annual ritual sacrifice at the hands of the Tar Heels in Chapel Hill and an embarrassing 28 point home loss to Virginia. Other losses were agonizingly close, like an OT loss to awful Florida State and a 3 point loss to Georgia Tech, where Solomon dropped a career-high 41 points on the Jackets.  The worst loss may have been an 85-51 smacking by NC State, where the Tigers faced a deficit of 50 points to a very bad team at one point.  Worse, after that game, the Tigers had to face #1 UNC in Littlejohn.

  I had noted in my midseason report on about.com that the Tigers were giving  teams some trouble at times, and that Solomon was always a threat.  I also  noted that they might have one big upset in them.  That upset came against  the Heels, where coach Larry Shyatt used a mixture of zones and traps to  confuse them and force them to depend on their outside shooting.  Joseph Forte was only 6-19 from the floor and Solomon's 26 points pushed the Tigers into the lead early in the second half.  Unfortunately for the Tigers, the next game proved to be a return to normalcy, as they were waxed by Wake.  Indeed, they lost in double figures to the four opponents following UNC, including a humiliating defeat to FSU in Littlejohn.  That game put the Tigers in the league's basement, but they would have a rematch with the Seminoles in the ACC Tournament.

  That game featured a balanced performance and a close win against a team  that had swept them.  It was their first ACC tournament win in 5 years and earned them another crack at the Tar Heels.  The Tigers shot the lights out early on, but fatigue and UNC's inside strength, coupled with a great shooting performance, sent the Tigers home.  There was a bit of a dust-up after the game between Shyatt and UNC coach Matt Doherty, as Shyatt felt that UNC was running up the score at the end.  Doherty did it to get back at Shyatt for calling a time-out at the end of their last game to milk the win a bit more. 

  There were a few positives for the Tigers this year.  Solomon was great for most of the year, even if he had trouble working in a team concept at times.  The frosh all showed promise, with Stockman looking like a potential star.  Chris Hobbs overcame a reconstructed knee to post some very solid numbers, leading the team in rebounding at 6.3 rpg and shooting 56% from the field.  Stockman shot 38% from three and led all frosh with 12 ppg. Clifton was athletic if erratic.  Ray Henderson and Tomas Nagys could both rebound a bit.  But the reality is that the Tigers couldn't compete with 6 ACC teams that went to the NCAA tournament and went 2-3 against the 2 that   didn't make it.  Things were especially ugly on the road, as the Tigers went 1-9.  Shyatt was given one more year to turn things around, and he brought in a good class of recruits to do so.  If he doesn't produce a  winning season and NIT bid, he may well be gone.

Team MVP: Will Solomon  

Best Win: UNC 

Worst Loss: Florida State  

*******************

2002 Scouting Report:

Who's Leaving: 

C Adam Allenspach, G Dustin Braddick, G Pasha Bains, F Chucky Gilmore, G Will Solomon

Who's Coming Back:  

G Jamar McKnight, F Ray Henderson, G Walker Holt,  F Tomas Nagys, G Ed Scott, G/F Dwon Clifton, F Chris Hobbs, G Tony Stockman   

Who's New: 

C Steve Allen, F Olu Babaloa, F Jemere Hendrix, F Sharrod Ford, G Chey Christie  

  Clemson lost unimpressive Allenspach, a 7-footer who rarely played like one, and three other members of the team transferred. Bains was a shooting specialist who shot 40% from three, Braddick an OK forward and Gilmore a Barkley-type forward.  None of these three transfers hurt the program much and I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if these exits were strongly encouraged by Shyatt. 

  More significant is the loss of Will Solomon, who declared for the NBA draft.  While few expected him to be a first-round pick (though he has a  shot at making the Memphis roster) he wanted to move on from Clemson.  Losing  him means losing the one proven scorer on the team, the guy who could get his own shot whenever he wanted, the one guy with star power on his team.  On the other hand, he liked being a one-man gang and didn't do much to make his teammates better.  His departure makes the Tigers even more painfully young, but if Shyatt can get them to play together, they have a chance. That's because they are actually bringing in a little bit of talent, with Christie having a skill set similar to Solomon.  Sometimes, when one player does too much for a team, having him leave can actually cause his teammates to step up.  Whether or not this will happen for the Tigers is the big question.

  The major question surrounding Clemson is: can their young players improve enough to become a factor in the ACC?  And will this even matter if the rest of the ACC continues to improve?  The only team that lost enough senior talent to really affect their outlook for next year is Georgia Tech, and I'm not sure the Tigers will be able to surpass them.   Will they be able to move  ahead of Florida State?  NC State?  In order to get to the NIT, Clemson will  need to win at least 16 games.  With an easy preseason schedule, this means that the Tigers will have to win at least 6 ACC games.  It'll be a tall order, but it is possible.

  In order for it to happen, this is what needs to occur:   1) Ed Scott must able to deal with the best point guards in the league; 2) Tony Stockman has to be an able #1 scorer; 3) Chris Hobbs needs to cut down on fouls and diversify his offense a bit, while still remaining a strong rebounder; 4) Sharrod Ford, Steve Allen or Olu Babaloa have to be  effective in the post as frosh; 5) Chey Christie must provide instant offense; 6) Jemere Hendrix needs to be able to penetrate.  In addition, if Ray  Henderson can improve his rebounding and defense, if Tomas Nagys can get  stronger and if Dwon Clifton can become more consistent, then the Tigers have  a shot.  A lot of "ifs", but the players surely know that they'll be playing  for their coach's future.

  The frontcourt is a question mark.  Hobbs overcame a knee injury to become a productive, physical player.  I expect his stats (7.3 ppg, 6.3 rpg) to improve as he gets healthier.  Beyond that, things get sketchy.  Henderson's contributions have been modest in his career, and though he will likely start, his status there is not written in stone.  The biggest threats will be rangy Nagys, a good shooter and surprisingly tough player who led the team in blocks (albeit with an anemic total of 17) and frosh Ford.  The latter is a bit skinny but a true post player who will likely get as much playing time as he can handle.    The other young big men seem unlikely to contribute much in their first years.  Allen is big but not athletic, Babalola is athletic but inexperienced, and Hendrix is a tweener who will more likely be a slasher than a post man.

  The backcourt, even without Solomon, seems a lot more settled.  Christie looks ready to come in and start right away.  He's a big guard at 6-5, so he may well be the starting wing.  Tony Stockman shot OK (38% from three), was third on the team in assists, and led the team in steals.  He's a streaky shooter who had some big games.  Ed Scott proved to be a good point guard, maintaining nearly a 2:1 assist to turnover ratio.  He's not a great defender or shooter (21% from three), however.  Unfortunately, beyond those three players lay more question marks.  Clifton and McKnight have shown very little so far, though they'll have every opportunity to get some backup minutes.       

  What I think will happen is that Clemson will develop into a dangerous offensive club.  Christie will surprise a lot of people and Stockman will  deliver as well.  What I don't see improving much is the defense.  They don't  have the size to deal with any of the league's better big men or the quickness to deal with the ACC's better point guards.  Their offensive flow is not the best either, as they were one of the league's worst teams in assists and turnover margin.  Eliminating such mistakes would allow them to beat the league's bottom feeders, and a more potent offense would give them a  shot in Littlejohn against the league's powers.  The freshmen are the wild card.  An enthusiastic and effective class that improves scoring, rebounding and defense will get them a winning record.  An average performance will put them in the basement again.  I think they'll get enough to move into seventh place.

     Projected Starting Lineup:  C Hobbs F Henderson G Christie G Stockman G Scott   
Rob is a thirty two year old Duke grad who's been an ACC fan since he was nine years old, when a young Duke team was beaten in the finals by Kentucky.  Since that time, he has been fascinated by the entire league and started writing volumes on it in rec.sport.basketball.college and other electronic forums in 1991.  Recently, he has been writing ACC analyses for Jazzy J's About.com site and regularly contributes features on women's basketball for the Duke Basketball Report.