Basketball
Schedule
Roster
Statistics
Rankings
ACC Scoreboard
ACC Standings
Devils in the NBA
Players
David McClure
Greg Paulus
Jordan Davidson
Martynas Pocius
Jon Scheyer
Gerald Henderson
Brian Zoubek
Lance Thomas
Steve Johnson
Nolan Smith
Kyle Singler
Olek Czyz
Elliot Williams
Miles Plumlee
Football
Schedule
Roster
Statistics
ACC Scoreboard
ACC Standings
Other
DukeUpdate Team
FaceBook Group
Duke Links 
Website Registrations
Home

2002 NCAA First & Second Round

March 14th and 16th. 

Bi-Lo Center. 

Duke 84, Winthrop 37. 

Duke 84, Notre Dame 77.

   The first weekend of NCAA play for Duke brought a game that was far less challenging than the average Duke practice and a game where Duke faced several worst-case scenarios and still somehow came through with a win. The great thing about the Winthrop game was that Duke put them away about five minutes into the game, and then let them know that they had no chance whatsoever of being competitive.  The Devils ended the first half on a 41-8 run.  The interesting thing about this game is that Duke's bench came out and played at a very high level.  Certainly, they were up by 40+ points at the time they came in, but the bench has let down before.  Instead, they actually increased Duke's lead in the last twelve minutes of the game.  This was significant because the confidence that Casey Sanders displayed against Winthrop (looking better than at any time this year since preseason) carried over against Notre Dame. 

   When the brackets first came out, I was immediately concerned with a potential Notre Dame matchup.  While the Irish have struggled at times this year, I thought they matched up quite well with Duke.  Chris Thomas is a top-notch point guard, and such players have given Duke fits this year.  Ryan Humphrey is huge and physical, and I worried that he might get Boozer in foul trouble.  I didn't think that Graves and Carroll would hurt Duke that much.  In this instance, I was 1 for 3 in making predictions. 

   The two biggest determining factors for Duke's struggle in this game were turnovers and perimeter defense.  Duke had their troubles on offense but they shot reasonably well from three (40%) and managed to get to the line.  But it was dumb turnovers that hurt Duke, including Ewing twice stepping on the sideline and Williams doing it once, as well as Dunleavy twice lifting his pivot foot (once under duress).  That's five possessions wiped out for Duke right there.  Duke also did a bad job fighting through screens and switching on the perimeter at times, allowing Graves and Carroll a lot of open looks. 

   Duke also faced a Notre Dame defense that opened in a triangle-and-two focused on Williams and Boozer, forcing Jones and Duhon to became  jumpshooters.  Coach K's immediate move of bringing in Dan Ewing was a smart one, for more reasons than one.  While he's been a poised and confident player all year, one thing that's clear is that his favorite spot to shot is from the corners.  And one thing that a triangle and two leaves wide open is a corner shot--it was an invitation to shoot.  (Nate James used to feast on teams who did this to Duke doing much the same thing.) If not for some shot selection issues inside and those pesky turnovers, Duke probably would have won rather easily.  Instead, Notre Dame took  advantage of Duke's mistakes, played great interior defense and got physical at both ends.  They basically had the game going in precisely the way they wanted in the second half but underestimated the ferocity of this Duke team when truly angered.  The Devils stopped the Irish cold in the last minute as Notre Dame missed their last five shots and committed a charge.  For the first time in a while, Duke battled back from a deficit and made the plays (and the free throws) down the stretch that put away an opponent. It should be remembered that Duke went through some nervous moments in last year's second-round matchup against Missouri, though the problems (and solutions) in that game were slightly different.  The bottom line is that Duke found a way to win.  

  ** Game One: Winthrop.

   There really isn't a whole lot to say about this game past a certain point, other than that Duke was really ready to play.  Winthrop actually took the lead to start the game, but a Boozer basket and a Dunleavy dunk off a Williams steal fixed that rather quickly.  Think Winthrop was a bit nervous?  They committed 5 turnovers in the game's first two minutes, the third of which led to a Williams three and the fourth (in the backcourt after said three) led to an easy Jason layup.  The Eagles got it together and outscored Duke 5-2 over the next couple of minutes.  The score stood at 11-7 with over sixteen minutes left in the half.  Winthrop would not score again for seven minutes.

   During that time, Duke ran off 24 straight points, featuring just about everything you can imagine.  The Eagles missed 6 shots, committed 6 turnovers and even missed 2 free throws during the run.  Meanwhile, Dunleavy scored 11 points (mostly on drives and lobs), Williams 5 and Boozer 6.  Duke scored off of steals twice in transition and popped a couple of threes for good measure.  Even after the run ended, Duke still outscored Winthrop 17-8 to end the half.  Duke was now getting to the line and hitting jumpers. Winthrop missed their last 6 shots and committed a couple of more turnovers, giving them 13 at the half. 

   The first five minutes of the second half were actually quite close, as Winthrop matched Duke 8-8.  They even turned over Williams to get a  layup and 4 consecutive points.  Jason responded by draining a three on his way out of the game to put Duke up 63-23.  All of the starters were gone by the ten minute mark, though Boozer and Williams came out first.  Duke slowly continued to up their lead in the last fifteen minutes of the game, outscoring the Eagles 21-14.  Andre Buckner and Casey Sanders played especially well, but the details can be found under their own individual listings.  Suffice it to say that the deep reserves were happy for an opportunity to get extended minutes and they didn't squander it.

   Duke got what they wanted here: a chance to stretch their legs and see where they stood after their big ACC Tournament run.  While Winthrop is from a weak conference, it's one they've dominated for the last four years. They also went to Clemson and won, a place where Duke has certainly encountered their fair share of trouble over the years.  But the Eagles were a bit intimidated during Duke's big run and simply didn't know how to deal with their pressure.  And whenever an opponent shows such a sign of weakness, the Devils know how to finish them off.

  ** Game Two: Notre Dame.

   Duke started the game with a Boozer three point play on a Williams feed, but Notre Dame quickly scored 5 in a row when Duhon missed a three.  Jones countered with a drive to tie things up, and Boozer gathered in an offensive rebound and fired it to Williams, who passed to Duhon for a three.  Right away, it was clear that the Irish would let Chris shoot whenever he  wanted and wouldn't bother to cover him.  Notre Dame's triangle and two did bother Duke a bit since Williams was unable to get a good look at the basket and Boozer wasn't getting touches.  Boozer had a bad sequence  where he turned the ball over, missed a shot and committed his first foul. Duke went nearly two minutes without scoring and the Irish took advantage by coming back to take a 10-8 lead with sixteen minutes to go.

   Jones had missed 2 jumpers and committed a turnover; in general, he seemed a bit frustrated by what was happening.  K turned to Daniel Ewing and told him to shoot when he was open.  With the holes in the zone in the corners (generally the toughest place to hit a three), Notre Dame was willing to give up that shot...but as I mentioned earlier, it's Dan's specialty.   His first shot was by accident--Jason drove the lane and had a shot blocked forcefully by Ryan Humphrey.  The ball leaked out to Dan in the corner, and he measured the shot and let fly for a three.  Humphrey blocked a Boozer shot and set up a runout as Notre Dame grabbed a 14-11 lead.  Dunleavy and Ewing struck with back-to-back threes, with Dunleavy not only getting the assist on Ewing's shot, he also got the rebound that  started the whole sequence.  A Williams three with twelve minutes left  in the half was Duke's fifth consecutive trey and it gave them a 20-16 lead.

   The Irish scored 4 straight, punctuated by a Humphrey rebound dunk. Ewing countered with 2 free throws and then a pull-up three after Notre Dame had tied the score yet again.  That three gave Duke control of the game for most of the half and triggered a 10-4 run.  Boozer hit a hook in the lane, and Ewing found Williams for a three before Jason scored on a drive. A Humphrey basket was matched by Ewing creating for Jones, boosting the lead back up to 6.  The teams went back and forth, but Duke continued to hold a 6-8 point lead as Williams was starting to get into a groove.  ND superfrosh Chris Thomas turned the ball over with less than three minutes to go with Duke holding a 7 point lead.  But Ewing stepped on a sideline, which gave Notre Dame a chance to score.  After a Williams miss, the Irish hit a three and close to within 39-37.  Another Boozer hook restored a 4 point lead.

   Then came a bit of ugliness.  Humphrey had been tossing around Dunleavy like a rag doll, and the roughness in the post was being left alone by the officials.  After Humphrey fouled Dunleavy after a missed Carroll three, the two got tangled as they were getting up and Humphrey tagged Mike hard with an elbow to the jaw.  He got caught and was given a technical.  Mike sank all 4 shots to restore Duke's 8 point lead.  Duke still had some  fouls to give, so they brought in Buckner to commit them to slow down  Notre Dame's offense.  The plan backfired a bit as Harold Swanagan was fouled with a second left in the half and hit both ends of a one-and-one. Still, Duke had a 6 point lead and looked to be in relative control of the proceedings.

   Duke seemed to take an even firmer grip of things in the second half, as Jones found Dunleavy for a three 13 seconds into the game.  Duke was unable to convert 2 Chris Thomas turnovers into scores, and a Jones turnover led directly to an Irish score.  That seemed to energize them a bit and was the beginning of an ugly 14-0 run.  Dunleavy missed a three and then the Irish got 2 offensive rebounds to get another score.  Jason then missed a three, committed a turnover and missed the front end of a one-and-one as the Irish took a 49-48 lead.  An offensive foul and turnover by Boozer led to 4 more Notre Dame points, and with fifteen minutes to go in the half, they led 53-48.  Humphrey had score 6 of those points, having his way down low as Boozer picked up his third foul.

   Casey Sanders came in and immediately passed out to Duhon for a three, sparking a 7-0 Duke run that put them back on top.  Of course, that "run" came during a period where Duke still couldn't do anything on offense. They missed 3 shots, committed 2 turnovers and missed the front end of a one-and-one but didn't lose any ground because Notre Dame missed 3 shots and committed a turnover.  Finally, Duke's improved defense led to Duhon forcing a steal and dishing to Jones for a hoop.  Two more Irish turnovers led to Duhon finding Boozer inside for a hook shot.  The Irish struck back with a three.  Boozer then turned the ball over and was called for a foul a few seconds later.  That was his fourth, and with ten minutes to go  Duke was suddenly in trouble.

   The Devils got the lead back on another Duhon three, but the Irish went on a 5-0 with Carroll and Graves hitting some big shots.  Williams hit his first (and only shot of the half), with his three bringing Duke to  within 1 with nine minutes to go.  But Notre Dame went on an 8-1 run over the next two minutes.  Duke missed a couple of shots and Duhon turned the ball over, while the Irish managed to get to the line.  The nadir of the game came when frosh Tom Timmermans (a rather unimposing player), got a three point play against an out-of-position Dunleavy.  The only good thing                happening for Duke was that Sanders was suddenly playing great defense,  altering a shot that still wound up as a basket after an offensive rebound. With 7:35 to go, Notre Dame led 69-62 and things looked dim for the Devils.

   Ewing came in and drove, dishing to Sanders for a two-hand slam.  Duke forced a miss and Dunleavy rebounded his own missed three, but missed both foul shots.  Notre Dame took advantage as Thomas finally slipped by Duhon for a layup, and the lead was 7 again.  After a half filled with miscues and just plain misses, Dunleavy gathered himself and sank a crucial 12' jumper along the baseline.  Duke got a break as Thomas missed the front end of a one-and-one and Williams found Ewing in the corner for a three that visibly energized the entire team.  With five minutes left, Duke had cut the deficit to 71-69.

   Boozer stepped in front of a pass and gave the ball to Duhon, who was fouled.  Chris calmly sank both shots, tying the game up.  Duke forced a miss and as Boozer threw a pass downcourt to Dunleavy, Mike took one step too many after he landed.  Coach K was furious because he felt that Dunleavy was pushed.  But Duke got it back when Thomas turned the ball over again, and Boozer gave Duke the lead when he drove in for a hook. The Irish recovered from this 9-0 gut-punch by going into Swanagan to tie things up.  After missed shots by Ewing and assorted turnovers, Ewing stole the ball away from Humphrey and was fouled.  The frosh coolly sank both attempts, putting Duke up 75-73 with 1:47 left.  Swanagan powered his way past Dunleavy to tie it at 75.  Williams went right at the Notre Dame defense and fouled out Swanagan in the process.  He then ignored the  "tomahawk chop" of the fans and hit both shots to make it 77-75, Duke. Both teams were waiting for the other to blink, and it wasn't happening.

   Humphrey missed a short shot and Boozer came up with a big rebound and was immediately fouled.  The big man only hit 1 of 2, making the margin just 3.  Timmermans drew a foul and hit both, making it 78-77 with 35 seconds left.  Notre Dame immediately fouled Jason, and the captain once again proved himself, easily hitting both shots.  Thomas missed a three but Carroll rebounded and barreled his way to the basket.  But Dahntay was in his way, and drew the biggest charge of his career.  After that, it was all academic: Ewing hit a couple of more freebies, followed by Jones as the Irish missed shot after shot.  Duke had survived by focusing in a tight situation and trusting each other.     

  ** Negatives:  

1. Valuing the ball.  Duke was very sloppy against Winthrop, committing 15 turnovers against a team that was just trying to keep its head above water. That carried over against Notre Dame, where Duke committed an absurd 19 turnovers.  For a team that relies on getting extra possessions by forcing turnovers and taking care of the ball, this was nearly disastrous.    

2. Blocking out.  Again, bad habits in the first game that didn't have an impact spilled over to the second game.  An undersized Winthrop squad  managed to come up with 13 offensive rebounds, and Notre Dame punished Duke for 19.  It's one thing when a horse like Humphrey comes up with 8 o-boards, but when guys like Graves and Carroll combine for 7, it's a  real problem.  Duke only turned the game around when Casey Sanders came on and started grabbing rebounds--Boozer and Dunleavy started to respond and get big boards down the stretch.  

3. Perimeter defense.  Notre Dame was only 4-18 from three, but they got a lot of open looks and hit some crucial shots.  Duke didn't do a good job of locking them up until the end of the game.   

  ** Positives:              

1. Playmaking. Against Winthrop, Duke had 22 assists for 32 field goals. Against Notre Dame, it was 17 of 24.  Williams and Duhon combined for 19 of them.  Playing as a team is what rescued Duke down the stretch, and  this is much healthier than having Williams do it by himself.    

2. Bench play. It was spectacular against Winthrop as the reserves scored 21 points, grabbed 14 rebounds and dished out 8 assists.  They were relaxed but played with a great deal of energy, and they helped the starters get a lot of rest (no starter played more than 28 minutes).  The reserves came up with 20 points, 10 rebounds and 4 assists against Notre Dame in just 32 minutes of playing time!  This was due to the efforts of Ewing and Sanders, who proved themselves at the most crucial time imaginable for the team.   

3. Toughness. When Duke absolutely had to get stops, they imposed their will on Notre Dame and came up with play after play.  The last minute of the game will go down as one of the best defensive stands by a Duke team ever.  The Irish got no good looks and then Jones took a charge to  preserve the win.     

Player-by-Player:   

  ** Boozer: He was Duke's most efficient player against Winthrop, hitting 8 of his first 10 shots.  He did a little of everything: getting a stickback, throwing down a dunk in transition, using a spin move in traffic and hitting a 15' jumper.  Coach K wisely benched him for most of the second, knowing that he'd be needed later.  He had a lot of difficulties against Notre Dame, and it was because of the way they were playing him.  Humphreys had the size but not the length to bother Boozer at all times, so they'd bring in a man to double-team him and force him to make decisions with the ball. But they didn't use Swanagan to do it, but rather Graves.  With Graves swatting at the ball and coming at an unexpected direction, Boozer looked a bit perplexed at times.  He wasn't able to roll to the basket and wasn't given the time to pass out of his difficulties.  He even committed an  offensive foul trying to break through the traffic.  Carlos did come up with 8 rebounds, including a crucial one down the stretch.  One good thing about this game for him was that while Notre Dame prevented him from getting easy baskets, he compensated by getting good position and converting on jump hooks.  This has become quite a weapon for him of late and speaks to the improvements he's made in the low post.  Another thing to note: though Humphrey had a number of impressive baskets and 8 offensive rebounds, it should be noted that he was only 7-23 from the floor.  Carlos actually did a pretty good job of fighting him in the trenches and pushed him away from the basket a number of times.  

  ** Dunleavy: Mike was not hitting much from three this weekend, going 2-6 in each game.  That's break-even point, but not much higher.  On the other hand, he was murder in the open court, dishing and dunking throughout the first half.  He had assists to Boozer and Williams, and was on the receiving end of two memorable passes from Jones.  He scored on an inbounds, hit  reverse on a drive and scored on cuts.  Winthrop had no answers for him as he also helped control the boards with 5 in the first half.  In the second half, he hit a three but otherwise didn't do much.  There was a lot of good and bad against Notre Dame, however.  He had 4 turnovers and was erratic from the floor.  His only field goals were a three in the first  half, a three to start the second, and his big jumper from the baseline. He also bricked a couple of free throws when they were really needed,  though he did hit 4 straight at the end of the first half.  Swanagan abused him inside (5-8 from the field) though Mike did managed a huge block on Humphries and a couple of steals.  The biggest stat of the game for Mike was his 9 rebounds, 6 in the second half when Duke needed everything they could get.  This was an OK game for Mike but wasn't quite up to the star level that Duke will need throughout the tournament.  

  ** Jones:  This was not Dahntay's most memorable weekend.  He took just one shot against Winthrop but had two gorgeous assists to Dunleavy, one of them a perfect lob pass.  His playing time against Notre Dame was shortened as Duke went to a 3 guard offense and Coach K wanted a better shooter on the floor.  This is not to say that Dahntay didn't come up with some big plays, because he did.  Despite ND playing him for the drive, he was able to penetrate and score a couple of times, once on a cut.  He also scored on a potential three point play but missed the foul shot. But with under 30 seconds left, he took a huge charge to seal the win, and had a couple of late free throws to salt the thing away.  He didn't have a  spectacular showing and turned the ball over too much (though he did have a  couple of nice assists for threes in the second half), but he made plays down  the stretch that helped win the game.  

  ** Williams:  Jason was his usual supernatural self against Winthrop in the early going, getting a steal and dishing to Dunleavy for a dunk.  Then he sank a three and scored on a pretty reverse after a Dunleavy steal in the backcourt.  He was firing at will throughout the half, pulling up for a 15' jumper and hitting another three and dishing to Boozer after a  steal.  All told, he had 12 points, 4 assists and 0 turnovers in the half. He came out hot in the second half, skipping the ball to Dunleavy for a three and then forcing a steal to trigger a 2-on-1 break that he finished. A drive and a three finished his day's work as he left the game with 12 or so minutes left.  In contrast, his game against Notre Dame was one long struggle, though he somehow tied for the lead in scoring with 18 points. Jason simply wasn't on in this game, and missed shots he would ordinarly make.  He didn't adjust well to Humphrey blocking everything he threw up against him as he was just 2-8 from two point range, almost all of those drives.  Jason also did a bad job of covering Carroll, who shot 7-14 from the  floor, mostly on short jumpers.  Jason did force 3 steals and had some crucial assists down the stretch, but until he hit those Big Time free throws, it was one of his worst games of the year.  And yet, Duke survived.   One thing to note is that Jason very rarely strings together two bad games in a row, so hopefully he'll be ready to go against Indiana.  

  ** Duhon:  Chris was busy keeping everyone happy against Winthrop, dishing to Dunleavy, Ewing, Boozer, Sanders and Williams.  He also had a steal and layup during Duke's mind-numbing 24-0 run, hit a three on a Buckner feed and ran a perfect 2-on-1 break with Williams.  His performance against superfrosh Chris Thomas will go down as one of the best-ever defensive showings by a Duke player.  In addition to holding him to 2-14 from the  field, he forced 6 turnovers from a normally unflappable player.  Chris also produced from the field, hitting 3-7 from three, including one shot that stopped a Notre Dame 14-0 run and another that gave Duke the lead. Chris was instrumental in the first Duke run of the second half, getting 2 assists, a steal and hitting that three.  He also was a big part of the run that ended the game, as he passed to Ewing for the three that brought Duke within 1, and then hit the all-important game-tying free throws.   All this and just 1 turnover in 40 minutes of play.  K has emphasized again and again how important Chris is to Duke's fortunes this year, and he really proved it in this game when Duke's Big Three were misfiring.  I am certain that other teams will try a similar strategy, so he must be  prepared to hit the open jumper.          

  ** EwingDan was pretty quiet against Winthrop, hitting a three on an out of bounds play and twice finding Boozer for scores.  He also had a  couple of turnovers.  He was very quiet in the second half, letting others take shots.  Of course, against Notre Dame, he was anything but quiet. Coach K knew right away what was going on and probably expected a move like this, and it was clear that Dan was ready to take up for his team. He knew that Mike Brey didn't think he could pick up the slack on offense for Duke, and was out to make a statement.  And he did so: loudly and  eloquently.  If you leave him alone, he will make you pay.  If you foul  him, he will make you pay.  If you don't block him out, he will grab rebounds all day.  Dan has had his ups and downs this season as any  freshman would, but the fact is that he was a state champion in Texas and was quite accustomed to coming up big when needed.  A player who knows and accepts his role who can also step up his game and become a dominant offensive player is rare, but it's clear that Coach K knew what he was doing when he recruited Dan.  The only negative in his performance against Notre Dame was his stepping on the sideline a couple of times.  He sank 3 of his first 5 threes and scored 11 points in just five minutes in the first half, and later had 2 assists.  Dan was also strong on the boards, grabbing 6.  He missed his first couple of shots in the second half but hit the biggest of his career with that three that brought Duke to within 1, and followed that with the biggest free throws of his career.  The first set put Duke up by 2, and the second set put the game out of reach.  He just has a cool about him that was reassuring as a fan--there was no doubt that he'd make the big play when needed.      

  ** Horvath:  Nick was a minor presence in both games, grabbing 2 rebounds in the first contest but only appearing for 2 minutes in the second.  He did manage a block against Notre Dame.  

  ** Sanders:  After the Notre Dame game, Coach K noted that Casey had been playing at his absolute best in practice this week, saying that he was doing things this week that he hadn't done all year.  You could really see this against Winthrop, where he went out to have a big impact on the game. Casey simply needs to fill his role, be in the right place at the right time on defense, and avoid dumb fouls.  This is precisely what he did  against the Eagles, as he swatted away 2 shots and grabbed 3 boards in 15 minutes of playing time.  The real bonus was seeing what he did on offense: he confidently swished an 18' jumper with a man hanging all over him, and then scored on a three point play, easily sinking the foul shot.  The big knock on Casey (other than his thin frame) is that when he's in a game,  it's clear that he's thinking instead of reacting.  Thinking too much  instead of learning how to make quick decisions will lead to nothing but problems in basketball since half the game consists of fooling your opponent into going where you aren't.  But Casey looked quite confident here and earned his extended playing time.  Coach K has also noted that Casey tends to play better when he feels needed.  Well, he was certainly needed against Notre Dame when he came in, and he immediately produced.  The first thing to note about his magical 7 minutes of play is that he didn't commit a single foul--and it's not like he wasn't in the thick of the action.  The first thing he did in the game was relocate a pass for a three.  Then he came on in Boozer's absence and got 4 defensive rebounds, keeping the Irish off the boards (score and otherwise) at a time when Duke was still struggling from the field.  His dunk caught everyone off guard, except perhaps himself.  The way he rebounded, defended and ran the floor was what everyone was hoping to see from him all along.  Hopefully he has more where that came from, because using him as a wildcard off the bench would cause all sorts of defensive matchup problems for other teams, not to mention  helping Boozer's cause.   

  ** Buckner: Andre played 12 minutes in this game and looked pretty darn good running the team.  After playing well against NC State, he continued to look aggressive, going to the hole twice.  He hit on one of those  drives and was fouled on another.  Andre replaced Jason in the game and also did a find job in finding others: he hit Duhon and Means for threes and Sanders for a three point play.  He has steadily developed as a basketball player in his tenure here and looked quite confident.  

  ** Christensen: Uncle Matty had a rebound basket and played great defense, blocking 3 shots.  It was great to see him so aggressive around the basket.  

  ** Means: Andy M sank a three on a Buckner feed.  

  ** Causey: Mark sank a couple of free throws and was one of nine players that had 2 or more rebounds.    

  ** Borman:  Andy grabbed a couple of rebounds in the first round as the last man off the bench, but also turned the ball over twice.  His four minute stint was one of the longest of his career.     

         Reported by Rob Clough, tmc@duke.edu

Rob's Archive

 

Rob is a thirty two year old Duke grad who's been an ACC fan since he was nine years old, when a young Duke team was beaten in the finals by Kentucky.  Since that time, he has been fascinated by the entire league and started writing volumes on it in rec.sport.basketball.college and other electronic forums in 1991.  Recently, he has been writing ACC analyses for Jazzy J's About.com site and regularly contributes features on women's basketball for the Duke Basketball Report.