#2
Duke 98
|
|
In the end, it all came down to star power, not
determination. Duke simply
had too much of it and Tech had too little.
Tech was not intimidated by Duke and ran at them hard, went to the
boards with authority, and attacked the ball handlers.
They simply had no antidote for Jason Williams in the first
half and Shane Battier in the second, and came unglued for just long
enough for Duke to impose its will and then cruise.
46 fouls were called in the game and there were about another ten
times that other fouls could have been called--things really got out of
hand as Tech went after Duke hard but the Devils wouldn't back down.
There was a bit of ugliness after talent-challenged Tech big man
Michael Isenhour threw an elbow in Mike Dunleavy's face on the free throw
line when the refs weren't looking. He
later put JD Simpson in a headlock as the teams were scrambling for a
loose ball. Carlos Boozer
retaliated by elbowing him after a Duke basket when the refs weren't
looking, and Isenhour lost it and retaliated--picking up a foul, and the
bench got a technical in protest. Speaking
of losing it, Tech center Alvin Jones, who had been doing a pretty good
job on Boozer up to that point, got whistled for his third foul in the
first half, mouthed off to the ref about it, and got a technical for his
troubles. He didn't come back
til late in the second half when the game was out of control.
The good thing about all this is that the Duke players do a nice
job of keeping their tempers when being pounded on, but show that they're
not willing to keep taking abuse from other teams.
** Positives: 1. Shooting. Duke excelled from three (10-22) and from the foul line (28-35), making a number of difficult shots under pressure. Their performance from the foul line was crucial, especially in the first half when Boozer went 10-12 and the team was 16-20. 2. Pressure. Duke harrassed backup point guard TJ Vines into 4 turnovers and starting guard Sean Fein into 2 of his own. They made it very tough on the guards in general to get their own shots.
3. Post defense. Battier was everywhere with 5 blocks, and while Boozer wasn't
officially credited with any, I had him down for at least 3 deflections.
Duke frustrated Jones into another mental meltdown, which is the best
defense of all against that flaky player.
**
Negatives:
1.
Ballhandling. Duke got a little careless with the ball in the second half,
turning it over on inbounds plays and such.
This allowed Tech a bit of a run, though Duke righted itself and
finished the game strong.
2.
Perimeter defense. Duke
occasionally had trouble dealing with TEch's screens to set up its
shooters, arriving too late to prevent them from getting a good shot.
Tech hit a solid 41% from three as a result.
Player-by-Player:
** Boozer: A very strong all-around effort.
Carlos went hard to the basket again and again, and was able to
convert from the foul line. Without
Jones in there, he was able to get all sorts of good shots.
More importantly, he was very active on defense, nabbing 3 steals,
and moved the ball around well. Best
of all, he owned the defensive boards in the second half, coming up with
7. He had 2 assists in the
early moments of the game, finding Williams twice, and also helped sparked
Battier's insane second half run with a relocation pass.
While he scored a number of his points on easy dunks, he also hit a
baseline jumper, scored on a drive and generally was aggressive and smart
every time he had the ball. Carlos
had no turnovers in the game and didn't drop a single pass.
He played smart and he played tough, and is coming closer and
closer to mastering Duke's defense.
** Battier: As Shane said, "a tale of
two halves". Coach K
thought he was trying too hard in the first half, where he was just 1-5.
Of course, he was doing other things well, picking up 3 assists, 3
blocks, 2 boards and a steal, but he also turned the ball over twice.
He simply didn't look comfortable on offense.
That all changed in the second half as he scored an amazing 20
straight points for Duke after starting the half strong. Shane missed a
lot of easy shots in the first half, including a couple very near the
basket. But he found Jason
for a three after a rebound and Boozer for a jumper in addition to playing
his usual good defense, but his lack of production made Duke a bit easier
to guard. But he started the
second half with a hard drive, and showed he was warming up by hitting a
15' jumper. Then the heavens opened, and Shane hit 3 threes in about a
minute, and went on a personal 12-0 run.
He wasn't done, as he went inside for a dunk and then back outside
for another three. Tech was
utterly bewildered and couldn't believe what Shane was doing to them,
which allowed Duke to basically deliver a deathblow.
It was nice to see the Devils aggressively using a hot player to
remove any chances their opponents had at coming back.
Shane got his 200th career blocked shot in this game, and is now
very close to entering the top 20 scorers list at Duke as well.
** Dunleavy: Mike had a very flaky game,
especially in terms of shooting. Maybe it was the Tech fans shouting
"airball" at him after he missed a three badly, but I think it
was him losing his temper after Isenhour elbowed him. I had never seen
Mike angry on the court before, and considering his normal icy-cool
demeanor, I think it affected his play a bit.
His foul trouble didn't help things either, but the only 2 baskets
he hit were in transition. He
did hit Duhon on a three and found Shane twice for baskets.
He also had a couple of very careless, uncharacteristic turnovers.
Hopefully he'll return to form against Wake.
** James: Nate took a few shots he probably
shouldn't have, especially ones where he shot very quickly instead of
getting set like he normally does. But in general, he was a bit quieter
than usual, getting very few attempts and only getting 1 offensive
rebound. On the other hand,
he did a great job smothering Fein, who was only 3-11 from the field.
He also came up with a couple of steals and hit a couple of his
patented corner threes. Not a
bad game by any stretch, just not quite as dominant as he had been.
** Williams: Jason was a scorching 6-7 from
the field in the first half, when he sensed that the team needed him to
carry the scoring load for a bit. He was more content to set the team up
in the second half, feeding Shane early and often.
But he was unreal in the early going, hitting 3 threes in the
first four minutes of the
game and scoring on a beautiful cut.
Then he found Dunleavy in transition and locked up Tony Akins after
he lost him on the game's first possession for Tech. He was part of a big Duke run that gave them an 11 point lead
in the first half with a tough pull-up jumper, and found Nate James for
threes twice in the half. He
scored 5 of Duke's last 7 points of the half with free throws and an
alley-oop, finishing with a remarkable 18 points despite picking up 2
fouls. While he couldn't get
anything to drop in the second half other than free throws (going 0-5), he
fed Battier for four baskets and Boozer for 1, cutting up the Tech
defense. About the only thing
he did wrong down the stretch was sloppily turning it over twice against
pressure. But he righted
himself and played smart down the stretch.
** Duhon: A fairly typical game
for Chris. He didn't shoot
much, but hit a three smoothly when he did shoot.
He ran the team well, notching 5 assists. He played solid defense
throughout, and he made a couple of rookie mistakes. As always, he did a
solid job of running the break, where he may well become Duke's best-ever
player in transition. He did
a great job playing with Jason late in the first half, finding Boozer for
a dunk and Williams on an alley-oop--a play they try to run at least once
a game. He also found
Dunleavy in transition and sank a free throw.
Other than getting careless with the ball late in the game and
fouling a bit too much, it was a fine outing
for Chris.
** Christensen: Matt wasn't really needed in this game as much as he has been
in the last few games. The
first reason is because Carlos was playing so well, and managed to stay
out of foul trouble in the first half.
The second is that without Jones, Tech was using a smaller, quicker
lineup, one that Matt probably wouldn't have been much use against.
Along these lines, with Jones out of the game, Coach K wanted to
attack Tech in the paint as much as possible.
Matt got 1 offensive rebound and also turned it over once.
** Love: When Dunleavy, James and Williams all had serious foul
trouble in the first half, Reggie was one of the players Coach K inserted
as a stopgap. He didn't end up doing anything.
** Simpson: JD came in for reasons similar to love, but he made
some contributions. He was on
the receiving end of an Isenhour headlock, but at least it kept Isenhour
from going for the ball. More
importantly, he got a defensive rebound down the stretch, and didn't foul
anyone. A solid performance
from the senior, who proved to be ready when his team needed him.
** Buckner: Like Reggie and JD, Andre
came in towards the end of the first half.
He also went up high for a rebound and played solid defense, and
also didn't commit a foul.
** Sanders: Casey came into the game
in the first half to help alleviate the foul trouble.
He got the ball in the post and immediately dished to Battier for a
jumper. He got 2 cracks at
the basket late in the game, but couldn't put them down.
Next Game: Wednesday, January 24th vs Wake Forest in
Cameron. The Deacs squeaked
out a win at home against Clemson on Sunday, but have been looking a bit
rattled lately. They gave
Duke a great game in Cameron last year, as the Devils had trouble handling
Songaila and Howard. This
means that Shane, Carlos and Mike will have to step up in a big way
against Wake's inside group, and Nate will have to contain potentially
explosive guard Robert O'Kelley. Reported by Rob Clough, tmc@duke.edu
|
| Rob is a thirty one year old Duke grad who's been an ACC fan since he was nine years old, when a young Duke team was beaten in the finals by Kentucky. Since that time, he has been fascinated by the entire league and started writing volumes on it in rec.sport.basketball.college and other electronic forums in 1991. Recently, he has been writing ACC analyses for Jazzy J's colbasketball.miningco.com site and regularly contributes features on women's basketball for the Duke Basketball Report. |