DUKE 72

ILLINOIS 69

December 4, 1999

Overview:

Duke defeated Illinois, 72-69 on November 30 in Chicago's United Center. Some have suggested that dropping the Stanford game was helpful in demonstrating to the young Devils what factors can contribute to a loss; this game taught the team how to win.  Winning a game in a hostile, big-time (20000+ fans) environment where the Devils did not play their best at all times was a big step in the team's development. 

The game had a very odd flow, with lots of streaks by both teams but very little consistency.  This was caused to some degree by defensive lapses. For Illinois, it was defending the break; whereas for Duke it was preventing penetration and rotating to stop threes.  Youth certainly had a lot to do  with it, and this was a key factor that prevented both teams from pressing their advantage and building up bigger leads.  This is the time of year when young players realize that winning games takes a lot more than talent. It's all about learning roles, knowing when to take chances and when to be conservative, and having contingency plans for every situation.  Most of all, clutch play simply means a player is mentally tough and extremely well- prepared.

All that said, I must emphasize a plea for patience from Duke fans.  If your favorite player isn't getting enough playing time, just wait for a bit. Everyone develops at their own pace, and that includes the still-recovering Boozer and still-skinny Sanders.  I don't think Coach K has any particular desire to go to a small-ball game, but if his post players are producing in practice, there is little choice.  Practice is where real improvement is made; games are simply final exams.  Duke's big men have a ways to go before they're ready to be big producers, but I think it will happen.  Look for the holiday period to be another important time for player development, especially since K likes to finalize his team's rotation sometime in January.

On to the game.  Lon Kruger is an excellent coach who was well-prepared for Duke, and he had a number of young players to deal with as well.  He started a number of upperclassmen so as to ease some of his younger players into the game.  The Illini were awful last year, but nearly won the Big Ten tourney and went on an all-important summer tour.  These tours (theirs was in Australia) have proven time and again to set up successful seasons for those who travel on them.  Notably, Kruger's 94 Florida team went on a tour and wound up in the Final Four.  Duke countered with starting Dunleavy, whose sparkling performance against USC earned him more playing time.

The early minutes featured some jitters from both teams.  Williams drew a foul going to the basket, something one hopes to see more of because of his quickness.  Battier had an awesome drive and slam past a bewildered Illini defense, and Duke started to go on a roll.  Williams in particular was picking apart Illinois, spotting up for a three, hitting Dunleavy on a full court pass for a layup, and then dishing two of the nicest-looking assists I've ever seen: a no-look to C'well for the slam, and a stop-and-dish to a cutting Dunleavy who made a reverse layup.  Duke went up 19-9 with about ten minutes left before the wheels came off a bit.  Cory Bradford made some tough threes to pull his team closer but Battier hit a three and got fouled to extend the lead to 23-16.  The Illini kept creeping closer but threes by Williams and C'well kept the Illini at arm's length, 33-25.

Illinois made its move with about five minutes left in the half.  Behind a strong post game and some friendly bounces, the Illini went on a half-closing 15-2 run.  Duke could not do anything right as C'well and Battier both missed shots that would have stopped the bleeding.  Worse, Duke turned the ball over three times and got outrebounded by 10-1.  It was this latter stat that was paramount, as the Illini were getting all sorts of second-chance opportunities and denied the Devils any kind of offensive flow.

The second half felt like Illinois was going to blow Duke out, as they went up 6 on a Griffin bucket.  But they were never able to extend their lead past 46-40 despite having all sorts of chances and control of the boards. A key early factor in the second half for Duke was Nate James, who was very quiet in the first half but whose tip-in of a Horvath miss started Duke's comeback.  A crazy double-clutch three by Williams brought Duke to within 48-47, and a brilliant C'well baseline drive and slam(+ the foul) tied it up. This was the beginning of a 10-0 run that put Duke in the driver's seat with ten minutes to go.  It featured another James tip-in, a three by Dunleavy off an offensive rebound and a drive by Williams.

The Illini crept back to within 4 thanks to more baskets off of missed foul  shot rebounds.  C'well calmly hit some foul shots and Horvath tipped in a Battier miss to put Duke up by 8 again.  Duke was definitely trying to chew up the clock; they were successful in this but had trouble converting when the shot clock was running down.  Williams charged twice and turned the ball over another time, but it was an excellent learning experience.  To his credit, he stuck a tough 17' jumper to put Duke up 63-56 with only six minutes left.  Illinois kept clawing their way back with more tough threes after, you guessed it, missed free throws.  Then came the biggest play of  the game: after Illinois pulled within 5 and were playing a tough zone defense, Williams managed to penetrate and kick out to Nate James, who buried the three. Up 8 with just four minutes left, Illinois was unable to come all the way back. The two Williams charges helped and Illinois got to within 68-66 with two and a half minutes left. 

This is when Carrawell really stepped up.  He drove and got fouled and sank 2 shots to put Duke up 4.  Illinois was ready to tie it up but only made 1 of 2 foul shots to stand at 70-69.  Chris took the ball, waved off Williams, and drove and got fouled.  Lon Kruger called a time-out to ice him. Time-in: swish.  Kruger called another time-out.  Time-in: swish.  Frank Williams took a ridiculous 24' jumper with Jason Williams playing tight D that hit the back of the rim.  Williams rebounded it and wisely ran out the clock. 

This was not a fault-free win, but rather an ultimate success after a  series of stumbles and advances.  The frosh now know what it feels like to pull out a win after being up, then being down and thoroughly outplayed and outworked, and then playing several minutes of error-free ball.  While Duke made a number of mistakes down the stretch, they played with a lot of energy and intensity that ultimately paid off with the excellent final  defensive stand.  There are some things to work on, like clock management and offensive efficiency when playing with a big lead, as well as overall intensity and good decision making.  Still, Duke earned its first win over a ranked opponent on the road this year, something that will help when Duke travels to Ann Arbor and faces a revenge-minded Michigan. 

One thing I like about Duke this year is the high energy of the bench. Players like Boozer are always very enthusiastic and cheering even when they aren't in.  This is crucial for a team trying to integrate so many new  players, and suggests that the team's leaders are doing a good job in keeping everyone on the same page.
       
** Negatives:

1. Defensive inconsistency.  Overall, the D is pretty good, but the usual nagging problems with rotating and fighting through picks are still there. Switches are not always smoothly made.  Shooters sometimes aren't stuck with a hand in their face.  Too much penetration is allowed to occur.  Slowly, one can see progress being made.  And despite lapses here and there, Duke did hold Illinois to 34% shooting.

2. Post play.  Boozer once again had trouble going up against bigger and quicker guys.  Christensen didn't do much in his limited minutes. 

3. Lapses of concentration.  Duke had trouble dealing with success, as a bad pass or shot would follow a run.  Williams sometimes took his eye off the ball and got picked a couple of times as a result, although to be fair Frank Williams has very quick hands.  Duke had severe problems dealing with the zone, although James was used to it and was able to find a "hiding place," where he got a good look. 

** Positives:

1. Shot selection.  Mostly pretty good.  You can see the team passing more, looking to run, looking to penetrate and there's less of players jacking up threes without looking for another shot first. 

2. Rebounding.  Some may be scratching their heads at this as a positive considering some of the big offensive rebounds that Illinois got from free throws, but Duke did a great job by outrebounding a bigger, deeper team.  And Duke got some big o-boards of their own, like a Shane one-handed rebound and slam and a crucial Nate James tip.  In the second half, Duke was getting all of the rebounds when they made their move, and Williams sealed the game with his board at the end. 

3. Foul shooting.  After worrying me a bit with early misses, the Devils were clutch down the stretch.  Kudos to C-Well in particular, who has not always been a great foul shooter.

Player-by-Player evaluation:
 
** Battier:  The team's default post player was brilliant offensively  in the first half, and brilliant defensively in the second.  He scored on two drives, a tip-slam and a three; but missed some foul shots, including the front end of a one-and-one.  He took an amazing 3 charges (reclaiming the lead from Dunleavy) and was astonishing on the boards in the second half.  He was especially efficient on the defensive boards, which he attacked with great energy.  He had a double-double for the game and also came up with 3 crucial steals.  Didn't score much in the second half but did take 6 shots, which he must continue to do.  It was nice to see him driving to the basket more and shooting fewer threes. 

** Carrawell:  Simply The Man.  In the first half, he was only 3-7 as his usually-reliable jumper wasn't falling.  In the second half, he simply found ways to score, with his gorgeous drive along the baseline for the slam and 12-14 foul shooting.  Throw in 7 rebounds (2 down the stretch) and three  assists and you have a typical Chris game.  Incidentally, he's only 2 points away from 1000 for his career, joining quite an illustrious club at Duke. He's got a shot at being a top 20 scorer; I'll keep the readers informed of his progress.  Chris is important because he's one of the very few Devils capable of creating his own shot at any time with the confidence to do so. He works best as a slasher but he's proven that his jumper must be respected. If he can continue to hit foul shots at his current (77%) clip, he has a good shot at all-ACC and possibly more.  Did I mention his defense?  He helped shut down Cory Bradford in the second half, a player who had been tearing Duke apart in the first.  He did a great job in simply denying him the ball, and didn't let him take an open shot, no matter how far out it was.  The adjustments that Coach K made helped win the game.

** James: Had a first half that can only be termed as dismal and a second half that can only be called spectacular.  Nate was pretty much a non-entity, taking off-balance shots and picking up some cheap fouls.  But in the  second half, he resumed his New Glue persona, with 2 big tip-ins and that absolutely clutch three.  He also added his usual 5 boards and a steal or 2. His one ugly glitch was a steal and 2-on-1 break that he botched with a bad pass to C'well, but to his great credit he moved on quickly.  This is what separates frosh from veterans: the ability to move on from a bad play to make a good one.  While he's still not completely smooth-looking out there, he plays a valuable role as a rebounder and hustle player who is strong enough to fight inside.   

** Dunleavy:  Started off in absolutely sensational fashion, with a steal and fullcourt run for a layup, then running the floor and converting a fullcourt pass from Williams, and then finishing off a sensational pass from Williams. He scored 6 points in 3 minutes.  He also had a block & rebound that took his man by surprise.  Mike saw a surprising amount of time in the post, where not surprisingly he was tossed around like a rag doll.  The Duke vets were tuned into this and rotated appropriately for the most part.  The slender Dunleavy still managed to get 3 boards, dished out 3 assists and swiped 3 steals.  He fouled out with three minutes left, which really hurt Duke down the stretch because they could have used his ballhandling and zone-busting ability.  Made a huge 3 when Duke was taking over the game in the second half, ironically off a missed free throw.  I can't wait for Mike to put on 10 or 15 pounds of muscle, because he'll be able to fight inside a bit more and make my Danny Ferry comparisons complete.      

** Williams: Jase had a game that was alternately sensational and aggravating. He shot well, hitting threes from relocation passes from Battier and Boozer, as well as his amazing double-clutch three in the second half that seemed to stun the Illini a bit.  Moreover, he went to his strengths (shooting from a stationary position rather than off the dribble) and minimized his  weaknesses offensively.  He also drove the lane a bit, hitting a couple off penetration but also tossing up some bricks.  His problems came with lapses in concentration: throwing the ball away with the shot clock going down, failing to protect his dribble, charging twice and picking up silly fouls. He made up for it by playing sensational defense down the stretch and showed off some fabulous passes early on.  When Duke can play fullcourt offense, Williams is truly in his element, with astonishing zips to C'well for a dunk and Dunleavy for a layup, plus baseball pass bombs.  It's in the halfcourt that Williams gets in a bit of trouble, and this is simply a matter of learning how to be patient.  He's already learned more judicious shot  selection, so I think it's only a matter of time before he learns the ins and outs of the half-court game and how to play with a lead. 

** Boozer:  'los looked a little lost out there.  He was certainly aggressive enough, but the weak shots he was putting up were being thrown out by  excellent shotblocker Marcus Griffin.  It's clear that he doesn't have the ups at this point to compete with premier big men; Coach K said that they hope he's ready by the time the ACC season starts.  Hopefully he'll get more of a chance to play against a DePaul team that is tough and talented but isn't that big.

** Horvath:  Nick is still a bit too skinny to make a big impact, but you have to admire his fighting attitude.  He showed off a nice touch on a hook in the first half and had a crucial tip-in with seven minutes left that put Duke up by 8.  Missed both of his threes but his aggressiveness (4 fouls!) combined with knowing his role make him a helpful presence.  He was on the floor at the game's end after Dunleavy fouled out, something that has to help his confidence. 

** Christensen:  Came in for just a couple of minutes.  Got a rebound but fell out of bounds before he could steady himself.

** Sanders:  Just played a minute at the end of the first half, didn't do much.

Next Game:  Saturday, December 4th vs DePaul in Cameron Indoor Stadium at 7:00pm.  The Blue Demons will try to avenge their embarrassing loss last year with top talents like Quentin Richardson and Paul McPherson.  Q has player-of-the-year type talent and will be a big test for Battier and Carrawell.

Reported by Rob Clough, tmc@duke.edu 

Rob Clough is the game commentator for DukeUpdate.com.

Rob is a thirty year old Duke grad who's been an ACC fan since he was nine years old, when a young Duke team was beaten in the finals by Kentucky.  Since that time, he has been fascinated by the entire league and started writing volumes on it in rec.sport.basketball.college and other electronic forums in 1991.  Recently, he has been writing ACC analyses for Jazzy J's colbasketball.miningco.com site and regularly contributes features on women's basketball for the Two Dukies.